The difference between Martin Sheen and George W. Bush is Martin Sheen is actually convincing when he acts like he's president.
Minnick's Big Win
I've been a huge fan of Idaho native Joan McCarter (McJoan), front pager for Daily Kos, ever since I first became acquainted with her from blurking the blogs. And I acted like a star struck teenager when she brought Kos to Idaho for a Democratic banquet. But her write up on the Labrador upset is wide of the mark.
Unfortunately for the incumbent, Dem Walt Minnick, because his best chance of holding on to his seat was the mistake-prone Ward, who was unlikely to generate the kind of enthusiasm Labrador can garner. The best a Dem can hope for in this state is low Republican turnout.
On the contrary, Labrador is Sali's heir apparent. Minnick won this seat in a district that gave McCain 61% of the vote. Minnick's opponent, Bill Sali, was a Republican flame thrower who became a congressman in a similarly divided primary after being funded by a right wing PAC, Club for Growth. Sali was the informal head of the ideological wing of the Idaho Republican party which constantly clamors for purity purges to cleanse it of notions they see as an anathema to conservatism.
In 2007, Sali helped lead a fight to defeat the Executive Director of the party, Kirk Sullivan, a big business lobbyist and a moderate. The moderates are largely composed of business types more concerned about government regulation than abortion. While smaller in number, they have most the money. A legislator that helped Sali in that fight was none other than Raul Labrador.
As a result of that schism, Sali ended up lonely and alone when running for re-election in 2008. His sugar daddy, Club for Growth, had other fish to fry. Big business Republicans like Dirk Kempthorne, Phil Batt and Governor Butch Otter were noticeably absent from Sali's campaign trail. And the big money, usually relied on by Republicans to fund their campaigns, actually started showing up on Minnick's campaign finance disclosure forms, probably as a result of Sali's xenophobic immigration legislation he was threatening. With the help of this money, Minnick was able to cobble together a sufficient coalition of disaffected moderate Republicans and eager enthused Democrats to squeak out a victory in a heavily Republican district.
The Republican primary yesterday was merely a continuation, if not a deepening, of the Republican rift. Fourteen months prior to the primary, Vaughn Ward was plucked from DC by Dirk Kempthorne, anointed by the Republican establishment such as Phil Batt, and funded by Idaho big business Republicans like Micron. Ward had secured the support of the NRCC who provided labor and promotion labeling him one of their "Young Guns" to take over DC from the likes of Nancy Pelosi. In stark contrast Labrador came to the race late, had sorely anemic fund raising, and secured the endorsement of ...Bill Sali, as well as most his colleagues in the Idaho House of Representatives known for its extremism and for bucking the Governor and his moderate cronies in the Senate.
This is not to say that Minnick has the general locked up by any stretch. Minnick is still clearly the underdog in a district that gave Bush 68% in 2004. And while Minnick has alienated his Democratic base by casting high profile votes against the administration, he has incumbency and a significant war chest to his advantage. Had Ward won this race, Walt faced a very real prospect of a unified Republican party behind a well funded candidate in an off year election in which the sour economy will reflect badly on incumbents. And while Labrador isn't burdened with Sali's caustic personality, he nevertheless represents the same extremist ideology that alienates big business and divides Republicans.
McJoan puts emphasis on Labrador's untested ability to garner enthusiasm. Labrador did not win the primary. Ward lost it. Labrador waged no apparent campaign in the traditional sense, lacking money, and he was ranging around for staff just one month ago. Tea bagger enthusiasm waned considerably after the passage of HCR even in freakin' Idaho as could be seen by the poor turnout for Caribou Barbie. And while Labrador definitely has tea bag supporters, Tea Party Boise endorsed him without polling its group and only after Ward tripped all over himself. Immigration still seems to be the lynch pin here and the big question mark is whether the xenophobes are going to be able to support a guy named Raul who makes his living legalizing Mexicans. Tea bagger support will also be mitigated by the fact that Minnick himself was endorsed by the national Tea Party organization thereby discouraging voters from labeling Minnick as "establishment".
In the end, I think there's no doubt that Minnick is happy the way the primary turned out. He just might have a shot at a second term.
- Sisyphus's blog
- Login or register to post comments



Strings
Wouldn't surprise me one bit to find out that Minnick (or his hatchet man) was pulling some of the strings behind the stories about Ward that just so happened to come out this close to the primary...
Wouldn't that be sumpthin '
for a Democrat, or his operative, to have such acumen? In freakin' Idaho?
Crosspost on Daily Kos
See: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/5/27/870417/-Sisyphus:-McJoan-Misses-Mark-on-Idaho-1st-CD-Race.
Thank you, Sisyphus.
Thanks Borg
I appreciate the wider audience. I'll be interested to see if IACI money lines up behind Labrador.
It will be interesting
To read McJoan's response.
good post, Sis
I read McJoan's post on Kos and felt exactly the same as you. You did a good job explaining the situation.
Ward lost. It was not a Labrador win, as votes in the primary are as often against a candidate as for them. If Ward had not made so many glaring mistakes, I think he would have won.
The big lesson for Ward and others like him is:
Don't plagiarize. Write everything yourself, check your facts, and make sure there are no skeletons in your closet. Everything on the net will be outed if you try any of this stuff.
Second lesson:
Don't trust your campaign manager or anyone else to cover your ass. Control your hubris and make sure everything is accurate.
"Not sure I agree with your police work there, Lou"
For a couple of reasons. Sali had alienated the Republican establishment to a much larger degree that Labrador has so far. Much as I like Larry Grant, I don't think he ran a great campaign against Sali, and all that Club for Growth money carried the day.
Second, I think the Idaho electorate is feeling more conservative these days. Republicans and Fox News have been bashing Obama relentlessly, and our Idaho conservatives eat that up, mindlessly. So, I think they're more likely to support a very conservative candidate.
And a third reason occures to me. Inhis acceptance speech, Labrador called Minnick an honorable man, and mostly focused on Nancy Pelosi as his foil. Sali was disliked as a rude clown. Labrador seems to have a bit of class.
Alan
Idablue.blogspot.com
Alrighty then
Not sure I disagree with your observations. In fact I made them in the article. But how does that matter, AT ALL, to the premise that Minnick is happy with the turnout of this election.
Labrador hasn't raised diddly. What do you attribute that to?
You're still mistaking the dog for the blanket. Get some more coffee.
A little vindication
Stu Rothenburg at CQ Politics also found Labrador's lack of fund raising compelling.
Minnick's Vote on Repealing DADT
For all the Minnick-disliking Dems here, Walt voted last night to repeal DADT. Do you think an Idaho Republican would have voted like that?
"When all else fails, revel in the absurdity of it all"
Post it
monkey boy. Be the ball.
Ignore Mis-placed Reply Below...
Sorry, still waking up (it's the middle of my weekend). Are you saying I should open up a new thread here, or put it on my home blog? I already came out in favor of repeal on my home blog back in January. Also, you're mixing movie quotes -- although you get points from the juxtaposition of "Buckaroo Banzai" and "Caddyshack", two of the better comedies of the early 80s.
"When all else fails, revel in the absurdity of it all"
I think you should do both
Link to your previous post. Now that the primary's over and Democrats have seen the loons striving to represent them in congress, they should be reminded of how good they have it when it could be so much worse.
And good on Walt for voting against government imposed discrimination.
And I'm well aware of my mixed quotes. I own both movies. Although some may quibble with your reference to Buckaroo as a comedy, I laugh often when I see it.
It's Clearly A Comedy!
I would challenge anyone who thinks "Buckaroo Banzai" isn't a comedy to roshambo over it. Any movie in which one of the characters is named "John BigBoote", while clearly surreal, has to qualify as an absurdist comedy -- my favorite kind.
"When all else fails, revel in the absurdity of it all"
Oh, now, settle down
No reason to get all exclamatory or to jeopardize what's left of your manhood. ;-) There were plenty of B sci fi movies that were also funny but not intended as such. Heck they even made a TV series and movie off the fact, Mystery Science Theater. IMBD has its genre listed as adventure, romance, COMEDY, Sci fi, in that order. Meh.
Speaking of which its time for this monkey boy to leave the building. You have a good weekend. We'll see you on the netbook.
Buckaroo!
Laugh while you can, monkey boy!
Whatever happened to Robocop anyway?
In the jungle
I'm sure Minnick learned his tolerance in the jungles of Vietnam, Bubblehead.
Actually...
Walt didn't serve in the jungles of Vietnam, as you well know. I noticed your Congressman voted against the repeal.
"When all else fails, revel in the absurdity of it all"
Deleted
Misplaced reply
I feel weird saying this, but
I think Raul's potential appeal to CD1 latino voters is something that should really be considered. With Ward, Dems would have had the latino vote locked up. But now. . .
Leaving us to think that Raul might be a somewhat more formidable candidate for Minnick than Sisyphus' very intriguing post here would lead us to believe.
Just cause he's Hispanic?
Venture forth into the politics of the Latino vote in Idaho and you'll find a whole lot of nothing. A very small percentage of their sizable minority actually vote and they sure as hell don't vote as a bloc. I hope to hear some dissent from some Latinos out there.
They don't have the motivation to do so, but Labrador just might provide it. As I recall he came out in favor of the Arizona ethnic cleansing law which has unified Arizona Latinos from swing vote status to firmly anti-Republican. My dad's wife is Hispanic and she sure doesn't think much of him. I reckon Labrador will be as popular with Latinos as Vasquez was.