Good Luck with That Reelection Thing, Walt

Within hours of Obama's speech giving strong support for the House Bill on health care reform, and with the endorsement of the bill by both the American Medical Association and the AARP, Congressman Walt Minnick announces he will vote against it.

“Over the last several months, I have met with thousands of constituents from all over Idaho’s First Congressional District. They are gravely concerned about the economy, about job security, and about the kinds of opportunities their children and grandchildren will have to make a better life.

“Like most of them, I believe that cutting down the cost of health care is one important step we can take in moving our economy forward. We need to reform the insurance industry by demanding accountability and increasing private-sector competition. We must reduce government spending on programs such as a Medicare, and look to Idaho for examples of ways to do just that. And we must reduce costs throughout the health-care system, so the long-term benefits of reform will truly help our economy to grow and our nation to prosper.

“Unfortunately, the new health-care bill in the House does not adequately meet those goals, so I will vote ‘no.’ However, I am encouraged by the work of the U.S. Senate, and am hopeful that the final bill I vote on will be one that all Idahoans can support.”

On the heels of the off year election, pundits were quick to draw conclusions on what the results meant for Obama and the sweeping majorities of Democrats elected to both Houses of Congress. Most acknowledged that the results in New Jersey and Virginia state races could not really translate into a message which pertained to national politics. The right wing noise machine had considerable egg on its face by highlighting a teabagging coup in the three way congressional race in upstate New York as a referendum on both Obama and the future of the teabagging movement as a winner for Republicans. The Democrat won that race handily against the Sarah Palin endorsed conservative in a district that hasn't seen a Democrat since President Grant sent Custer to eradicate "injuns", secure the Black Hills gold fields, die an ignoble death.

Despite the fact that Democrats increased their margin in Congress by two on Tuesday, some still maintain that the state results were by too wide a margin to ignore, spelling doom for Democrats next year. While certainly 'right', they might also be correct, but not for the reasons they cite. In Virginia the Democrats ran as DINO's, conservative Democrats. Democrats stayed home. In New Jersey the Governor was unpopular with 30% favorables but still managed to come within 5% of winning, in part, because of Obama campaigning for him. In the end its all about the base.

Blaming election setbacks on a drop in voter enthusiasm, Congressional Democrats said Wednesday that losses in governors’ races in Virginia and New Jersey — and a striking House win in New York — should give new urgency to their legislative agenda, including a sweeping health care overhaul.

As they assessed the results, Democratic lawmakers and party strategists said their judgment was that voters remained very uneasy about the economy and did not see Democrats producing on the health, energy and national security changes they promised when voters swept them to power only a year ago.

“Most of us ran on that,” said Representative Gerald E. Connolly, Democrat of Virginia and president of the party’s freshman class. “We must deliver. I need to give Democrats something to be excited about.”

Walt seems to be using fuzzy math. He won by a tiny margin of less than 5000 votes. Yet he seems to focus all his efforts on representing those voters on top of the pyramid that put him over the election threshold, to the exclusion of the voters at base of that pyramid upon whose shoulders those independents were standing. Walt won't be rescued by the senate Baucus bill which has already been derided as a corporate giveaway with punitive actions threatened against uninsured voters. Neither will he be rescued by Republican efforts to cobble together an alternative.

Walt's got a base problem, and waiting until next year to address it will undo everything he's done thus far in reaching to the middle. As one of the most endangered Democrats in a conservative district, Walt is making his loss in next year's election a self fulfilling prophecy by failing to dance with the people that brought him to the party. Walt seems to be boxing himself into a corner where the only solution is to seek a new base and change his party designation. This maneuver invokes a strong negative value from the lack of loyalty and, with it, has a considerable risk of rejection by the new partners. It would be a bold move and the primary is only six months away.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I could not

have stated the problem better myself. You certainly hit the nail on the head and I can vouch that base Democratic votes are slipping away in the far north of Idaho for just those reasons that you listed. Thank you, Sisyphus.

Walt might be

crazy like a fox. Certainly every Democrat motivated to vote for Obama also voted for Walt. But since Obama won't be on the ballot next year, Walt can't count on all of them next time, particularly so if Walt consistently votes against Obama. Everyone is certainly thinking 2010 will be a referendum on Obama however. And this is where it gets confusing. The republican noise machine is the wind in the sails of the teabaggers and will certainly be going great gonzo next election. They'll never vote for Walt no matter how anti-Obama he votes and they're doing everything they can to take over the party aparatchik. Given the lip service being paid by Republican leaders, I expect they'll have great incentive to fall into line which will be anti-Obama, meaning anti-Democrat. Given McCain carried the district by more than 20 points Walt has to make up the shortfall of Democrats. But without a Sali for moderate Republicans to vote against, it'll be a tough row to hoe.

I just don't think he can afford to take Democrats for granted. If it is a referendum on Obama, Democrats will have a tough time voting for Walt to express that sentiment. Unless he gives them a reason. Any one reason on an issue important to them. That means a populist issue, one that sellable in the district to both sides. I think hcr with a public option is that issue but he disagrees largely on ideological grounds. I think he should exercise a little political discretion and reevaluate.

If there's ever a time to demonstrate Democratic unity and

and strength, I would think it would be on the matter of healtch care reform. If Obama and the Democrats can't get this passed, then what will happen on subsequent reforms? Especially ones that hang on the strength of getting hcr passed?

Some of my biggest problems with Walt are based on his fiscal and environmental policies and ideas. He talks (and writes)as if he is for the middle, rapidly increasing poorer classes, yet his policies and ideas basically provide just more and more wealth and power to single corporations. Burning biomass is a textbook example of such. His ideas on hcr likewise provide more for big companies than the average Idahoan.

Finally, in terms of probability factors alone, the chances of a Democratic congressman from Idaho being elected more than one term are pretty darn low. So why doesn't he use this term to do as much for Idaho as possible by pushing a Democratic agenda? Idaho Democrats may moan and groan about big government, but they certainly like good jobs, decent wages, good education, and even government handouts. We pay more into our infrastructure than the corporations do, so it's about time for some change, the changes that Obama promised.

Kudos to Walt

for voting against the Stupak-Pitts amendment which would curtail a woman's constitutional rights in receiving health care. But it rings kinda hollow since he's voting against an amendment to the health care bill he fully intended to vote down in any event.

43SB makes the Statesman editorial.

Due to some light blogging lately I haven't earned any respect. But Kevin Richert must have picked up on the above post after I had a brief discussion with Larry LaRocco regarding Walt's base problem on Kevin's blog post.

The pseudonymous Sisyphus, blogging at the Democratic site 43rd State Blues, is more direct: "As one of the most endangered Democrats in a conservative district, (Minnick) is making his loss in next year's election a self-fulfilling prophecy by failing to dance with the people that brought him to the party."

I'd missed it in the published edition, thinking Kevin was just reprinting his blog post, as is his want. Thanks to hizzonor for pointing it out. Kevin was riffing off a remarkably similar post by Marc Johnson whose experience in this area is vast. You may recall, Marc's partner at the Gallatin Group, Isaac Squyres, ran Minnick's campaign, but only ran his congressional office for a very brief time after the election. Certainly Minnick is still very close to Gallatin who counts the titular head of Idaho Democrats, Cecil Andrus, among its prominent members. Just the fact Marc published such a critique speaks volumes on the existence, if not size, of the base problem.