Bechtel BWXT right-wingers at INEEL abuse use of e-mail, attack Kerry


Yesterday's Idaho State Journal has a story about Bechtel
BWXT
employees at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental
Laboratory
using email to send hateful and inaccurate information about
Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry. 43rd State Blues
has obtained a copy of the email, and we'll show it to you below. First, here's
a link to the newspaper article at journalnet.com:

Hatch Act infraction at INEEL investigated

By Holden Parrish

Assistant City Editor

ARCO - A possible Hatch Act infraction at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory has been investigated and dismissed. However, action was taken to address the matter in hopes of avoiding repeat occurrences, a site spokesman said Wednesday.

The complaint centered around a series of forwarded e-mail messages that appear to have originated at the federally funded facility. The messages contain a series of testimonials attributed to U.S. military veterans who served in Vietnam alongside or during the same time as Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, a U.S. senator from Massachusetts.

The comments were generally not favorable to Kerry. Also, another INEEL staffer who received the e-mail forwarded it to other site employees with the appended remark, "Let's get this out to as many people as we can. This commie, pinko, traitor."

For information on the Hatch Act, click here. Or do a search of the Hatch Act
on Google News -- you'll be surprised how often it has to be enforced.

This type of complaint is supposed to go before the Merit Systems Protection Board, though I doubt this one did. Bechtel BWXT oversees the INEEL because the United States Government pays them, with money from our taxes, to do so. To say they've "dismissed" any notion that their employees' action may be in violation of the Hatch Act sounds like an excuse to sweep the problem under the rug and make it go away.

But maybe we're making too much of this. After all, it was probably just a couple of Bechtel BWXT employees exchanging email, right?

Actually, it was 19 employees, from what we can tell, plus other non-employees
who were sent this through the INEEL's government mail servers to the "Friends
and Family@INEL.inel.gov...
" The email, which appears to have originally
be sent by Bechtel BWXT employee Burl Summers, was then forwarded by two other
employees, Leslie Chapman and Donna Andrews, who sent it on to others. I've
X'ed out phone numbers and parts of their email addresses.

----- Original Message -----
From: DKA@xxxxxxxx.xxx
To: Friends_and_Family@INEL.inel.gov
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 9:23 AM
Subject: Kerry

(208) 526-XXXX

----- Forwarded by Donna K Andrews/xxxxxxxx/INEEL/US on 06/22/2004 09:23 AM -----

Stella L Jacobsen

06/21/2004 05:26 PM

To: xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx/INEEL/US@INEL, xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx/INEEL/US@INEL, xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx/INEEL/US@INEL, xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx/INEEL/US@INEL, xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx/INEEL/US@INEL, xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx/INEEL/US@INEL, xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx/INEEL/US@INEL, xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx/INEEL/US@INEL

cc:

Fax to:

Subject: Kerry

----- Forwarded by Stella L Jacobsen/xxxxxxxx/INEEL/US on 06/21/2004 05:24 PM -----

Leslie A Chapman

06/18/2004 03:18 PM

To: xxxxxxxx@hirning.com, xxxxxxxxkwiklube@aol.com, xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx/INEEL/US@INEL, xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx/INEEL/US@INEL, xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx/INEEL/US@INEL, xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx/INEEL/US@INEL, xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx/INEEL/US@INEL, xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx/INEEL/US@INEL, xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx/INEEL/US@INEL, xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx/INEEL/US@INEL, xxxxxxxx@cox.net

cc:

Fax to:

Subject: Kerry

Let's get this out to as many people as we can. This commie, pinko, traitor.

----- Forwarded by Leslie A Chapman/xxxxxxxx/INEEL/US on 06/18/2004 03:15 PM -----

Burl L Summers

06/18/2004 11:25 AM

To: Leslie A Chapman/xxxxxxxx/INEEL/US@INEL, xxxxxxxx@aol.com

cc:

Fax to:

Subject: Kerry

Swift Boat Quotes about John Kerry

.

"We resent very deeply the false war crimes charges he made coming back from Vietnam in 1971 and repeated in the book "Tour of Duty." We think those cast an aspersion on all those living and dead, from our unit and other units in Vietnam. We think that he knew he was lying when he made the charges, and we think that they're unsupportable. We intend to bring the truth about that to the American people.

We believe, based on our experience with him, that he is totally unfit to be the Commander-in-Chief."

-- John O'Neill, spokesman, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth

.

"I do not believe John Kerry is fit to be Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces of the United States. This is not a political issue. It is a matter of his judgment, truthfulness, reliability, loyalty and trust -- all absolute tenets of command. His biography, 'Tour of Duty,' by Douglas Brinkley, is replete with gross exaggerations, distortions of fact, contradictions and slanderous lies. His contempt for the military and authority is evident by even a most casual review of this biography. He arrived in-country with a strong anti-Vietnam War bias and a self-serving determination to build a foundation for his political future. He was aggressive, but vain and prone to impulsive judgment, often with disregard for specific tactical assignments. He was a 'loose cannon.' In an abbreviated tour of four months and 12 days, and with his specious medals secure, Lt.(jg) Kerry bugged out and began his infamous betrayal of all United States forces in the Vietnam War. That included our soldiers, our marines, our sailors, our coast guardsmen, our airmen, and our POWs. His leadership within the so-called Vietnam Veterans Against the War and testimony before Congress in 1971 charging us with unspeakable atrocities remain an undocumented but nevertheless meticulous stain on the men and women who honorably stayed the course. Senator Kerry is not fit for command."

-- Rear Admiral Roy Hoffman, USN (retired), chairman, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth

.

"During Lt.(jg) Kerry's tour, he was under my command for two or three specific operations, before his rapid exit. Trust, loyalty and judgment are the key, operative words. His turncoat performance in 1971 in his grubby shirt and his medal-tossing escapade, coupled with his slanderous lines in the recent book portraying us that served, including all POWs and MIAs, as murderous war criminals, I believe, will have a lasting effect on all military veterans and their families.
Kerry would be described as devious, self-absorbing, manipulative, disdain for authority, disruptive, but the most common phrase that you'd hear is 'requires constant supervision.'"

-- Captain Charles Plumly, USN (retired)

.

"Thirty-five years ago, many of us fell silent when we came back to the stain of sewage that Mr. Kerry had thrown on us, and all of our colleagues who served over there. I don't intend to be silent today or ever again. Our young men and women who are serving deserve no less."

-- Andrew Horne

.

"In my specific, personal experience in both coastal and river patrols over a 12-month period, I never once saw or heard anything remotely resembling the atrocities described by Senator Kerry. If I had, it would have been my obligation to report them in writing to a higher authority, and I would certainly have done that. If Senator Kerry actually witnessed or participated in these atrocities or, as he described them, 'war crimes,' he was obligated to report them. That he did not until later when it suited his political purposes strikes me as opportunism of the worst kind. That he would malign my service and that of his fellow sailors with no regard for the truth makes him totally unqualified to serve as Commander-in-Chief."
-- Jeffrey Wainscott

.

"I signed that letter because I, too felt a deep sense of betrayal that someone who took the same oath of loyalty as I did as an officer in the United States Navy would abandon his group here (points to group photo) to join this group here (points to VVAW protest photo), and come home and attempt to rally the American public against the effort that this group was so valiantly pursuing.

It is a fact that in the entire Vietnam War we did not lose one major battle. We lost the war at home... and at home, John Kerry was the Field General."

-- Robert Elder

.

"My daughters and my wife have read portions of the book 'Tour of Duty.' They wanted to know if I took part in the atrocities described. I do not believe the things that are described happened.

Let me give you an example. In Brinkley's book, on pages 170 to 171, about something called the 'Bo De massacre' on November 24th of 1968... In Kerry's description of the engagement, first he claimed there were 17 servicemen that were wounded. Three of us were wounded. I was the first..."

-- Joseph Ponder

.

"While in Cam Rahn Bay, he trained on several 24-hour indoctrination missions, and one special skimmer operation with my most senior and trusted Lieutenant. The briefing from some members of that crew the morning after revealed that they had not received any enemy fire, and yet Lt.(jg) Kerry informed me of a wound -- he showed me a scratch on his arm and a piece of shrapnel in his hand that appeared to be from one of our own M-79s. It was later reported to me that Lt.(jg) Kerry had fired an M-79, and it had exploded off the adjacent shoreline. I do not recall being advised of any medical treatment, and probably said something like 'Forget it.' He later received a Purple Heart for that scratch, and I have no information as to how or whom.

Lt.(jg) Kerry was allowed to return to the good old USA after 4 months and a few days in-country, and then he proceeded to betray his former shipmates, calling them criminals who were committing atrocities. Today we are here to tell you that just the opposite is true. Our rules of engagement were quite strict, and the officers and men of Swift often did not even return fire when they were under fire if there was a possibility that innocent people -- fishermen, in a lot of cases -- might be hurt or injured. The rules and the good intentions of the men increased the possibility that we might take friendly casualties."

-- Commander Grant Hibbard, USN (retired)

.

"Lt. Kerry returned home from the war to make some outrageous statements and allegations... of numerous criminal acts in violation of the law of war were cited by Kerry, disparaging those who had fought with honor in that conflict. Had war crimes been committed by US forces in Vietnam? Yes, but such acts were few and far between. Yet Lt. Kerry have numerous speeches and testimony before Congress inappropriately leading his audiences to believe that what was only an anomaly in the conduct of America's fighting men was an epidemic. Furthermore, he suggested that they were being encouraged to violated the law of war by those within the chain of command.

Very specific orders, on file at the Vietnam archives at Texas Tech University, were issued by my father (Admiral Elmo Zumwalt) and others in his chain of command instructing subordinates to act responsibly in preserving the life and property of Vietnamese civilians."

-- Lt. Col. James Zumwalt, USMC (retired)

.

"We look at Vietnam... after all these years it is still languishing in isolated poverty and helplessness and tyranny. This is John Kerry's legacy. I deeply resent John Kerry's using his Swift boat experience, and his betrayal of those who fought there as a stepping-stone to his political ambitions."

-- Barnard Wolff

.

"In a whole year that I spent patrolling, I didn't see anything like a war crime, an atrocity, anything like that. Time and again I saw American fighting men put themselves in graver danger trying to avoid... collateral damage.

When John Kerry returned to the country, he was sworn in front of Congress. And then he told my family -- my parents, my sister, my brother, my neighbors -- he told everyone I knew and everyone I'd ever know that I and my comrades had committed unspeakable atrocities."

-- David Wallace

.

"I served with these guys. I went on missions with them, and these men served honorably. Up and down the chain of command there was no acquiescence to atrocities. It was not condoned, it did not happen, and it was not reported to me verbally or in writing by any of these men including Lt.(jg) Kerry.

In 1971, '72, for almost 18 months, he stood before the television audiences and claimed that the 500,000 men and women in Vietnam, and in combat, were all villains -- there were no heroes. In 2004, one hero from the Vietnam War has appeared, running for President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief. It just galls one to think about it."

-- Captain George Elliott, USN (retired)

.

"During the Vietnam War I was Task Force Commander at An Thoi, and my tour of duty was 13 months, from the end of Tet to the beginning of the Vietnamization of the Navy units.

Now when I went there right after Tet, I was restricted in my movements. I couldn't go much of anyplace because the Vietcong controlled most of the area. When I left, I could go anywhere I wanted, just about. Commerce was booming, the buses were running, trucks were going, the waterways were filled with sampans with goods going to market, but yet in Kerry's biography he says that our operations were a complete failure. He also mentions a formal conference with me, to try to get more air cover and so on. That conference never happened..."

-- Captain Adrian Lonsdale, USCG (retired)

.

"I was in An Thoi from June of '68 to June of '69, covering the whole period that John Kerry was there. I operated in every river, in every canal, and every off-shore patrol area in the 4th Corps area, from Cambodia all the way around to the Bo De River. I never saw, even heard of all of these so-called atrocities and things that we were supposed to have done.

This is not true. We're not standing for it. We want to set the record straight."

-- William Shumadine

.

"In 1971, when John Kerry spoke out to America, labeling all Vietnam veterans as thugs and murderers, I was shocked and almost brought to my knees, because even though I had served at the same time and same unit, I had never witnessed or participated in any of the events that the Senator had accused us of. I strongly believe that the statements made by the Senator were not only false and inaccurate, but extremely harmful to the United States' efforts in Southeast Asia and the rest of the world. Tragically, some veterans, scorned by the antiwar movement and their allies, retreated to a life of despair and suicide. Two of my crewmates were among them. For that there is no forgiveness. "

-- Richard O'Meara

.

"My name is Steve Gardner. I served in 1966 and 1967 on my first tour of duty in Vietnam on Swift boats, and I did my second tour in '68 and '69, involved with John Kerry in the last 2 1/2 months of my tour. The John Kerry that I know is not the John Kerry that everybody else is portraying. I served alongside him and behind him, five feet away from him in a gun tub, and watched as he made indecisive moves with our boat, put our boats in jeopardy, put our crews in jeopardy... if a man like that can't handle that 6-man crew boat, how can you expect him to be our Commander-in-Chief?"

-- Steven Gardner

.

"I served in Vietnam as a boat officer from June of 1968 to July of 1969. My service was three months in Coastal Division 13 out of Cat Lo, and nine months with Coastal Division 11 based in An Thoi. John Kerry was in An Thoi the same time I was. I'm here today to express the anger I have harbored for over 33 years, about being accused with my fellow shipmates of war atrocities.

All I can say is when I leave here today, I'm going down to the Wall to tell my two crew members it's not true, and that they and the other 49 Swiftees who are on the Wall were then and are still now the best."

-- Robert Brant

.

"I never saw, heard of, or participated in any Swift boat crews killing cattle, poisoning crops, or raping and killing civilians as charged by John Kerry, both in his book and in public statements. Since we both operated at the same time, in the same general area, and on the same missions under the same commanders, it is hard to believe his claims of atrocities and poor planning of Sea Lord missions.

I signed this letter because I feel that he used Swift boat sailors to proclaim his antiwar statements after the war, and now he uses the same Swift boat sailors to support his claims of being a war hero. He cannot have it both ways, and we are here to ask for full disclosure of the proof of his claims."

-- James Steffes

.

.

Last Updated Monday, May 17 2004 @ 12:16 PM PDT

These guys sound angrier than a wet hen. How can you argue with letters like
these? Well, if you're Joe Conason, author of the best selling
books "Big
Lies: The Right Wing Propaganda Machine and How It Distorts the Truth"
and
"The
Hunting of the President: The Ten-Year Campaign to Destroy Bill and Hillary
Clinton,"
as well as a writer for Salon.com,
you do it like
this
:

The GOP's not-so-impartial hit man

Desperate to denigrate John Kerry's war record, Republicans have trotted out a "nonpartisan" Navy Vietnam vet -- who was a protege of Nixon dirty trickster Charles Colson and whose law firm is closely tied to the Bush White House.

April 23, 2004 | Houston attorney John E. O'Neill, the Navy veteran who has emerged recently as a harsh and ubiquitous critic of John Kerry's military service, tells reporters that he has never really been interested in politics and isn't motivated by partisan interests. In the media, O'Neill is often described simply as a Vietnam vet still enraged by the antiwar speeches Kerry delivered more than 30 years ago. That was when O'Neill first came to public attention as a clean-cut, pro-war prot

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It's true, its true

The stories I've heard out on the desert and in Idaho Falls is very scary. I'm more afraid of the folks who work out there, than any terroist attack.