Bipartisanship is another name for date rape.
Found this Grand Forks Herald letter to the editor:
MINTO, N.D. In his recent "Fahrenheit 9/11" column, Leonard Pitts equates the 1960s "liberal smugness" with today's conservative "self-righteous anger".
I just can't see it. The "smugness" only hurt the Democrats, while the "anger" is a cancer that will harm the whole country. Pitts certainly is correct in his observation that anger is an infectious disease.
It would seem Michael Moore's movie and the many critical books are a sign that conservative anger already has split our nation, but we still can hope they are just a protest against the tide that is dragging America into the realm of radical right-wing extremism.
To those who think to restore happiness and harmony by urging Democrats to discard their principals and quietly go along with the neo-con philosophy: Forget it. My firsthand experience when they turned Idaho into a one-party state was that when it no longer was necessary to be "nice" or to even give lip service to civility, the hatred and animosity only increased.
Actually, you can see it in the country at large. The neo-cons control the presidency, the House, the Senate and the Supreme Court. They should be grinning from ear to ear, but if you think they're happy, just tune in to the right-wing radio talk shows some day.
When President Bush came to Washington, the right hailed him as the "great consensus builder." Instead, he is on the brink of dividing the country as it hasn't been since the Civil War. A "hate-filled, angry, genie" has been freed from his bottle, and I, like Pitts, don't have a clue as to getting him back inside.
David Neiwert at Orcinus has a new posting on his weblog about Bush and his administration trying to attack Kerry and Edwards for being "liberal, liberal, liberal!" Then Dubya and his minions get their panties all in a twist when John Kerry states, "I actually represent the conservative values that they feel."
So many right-wingers across the country claim to be "conservatives," but as David writes, we should judge them by their actions, not their words:
Bush, after all, lays claim to the mantle of conservatism, at least leadership of the movement that has seized control of all layers of the federal government. But how really conservative is it?
Is it conservative to rack up the largest national deficit in history, with only the vaguest outlines of a plan for putting the national budget back in the black?
Is it conservative to ignore warnings of imminent terrorist threats merely because a preoccupation with terrorism is seen as too similar to your predecessor's presidency?
Is it conservative to jettison a half-century's worth of mulitlateral diplomacy and cooperation to pursue a radical vision of a unilateralist America supposedly capable of imposing its will on the rest of the world?
Is it conservative to attack another nation under false pretenses?
Is it conservative to allow torture, rape and killing of civilians under the purview of interrogating prisoners in the nation we now occupy as a result of that vision?
Is it really conservative to adopt the legal position that the president's wartime powers allow him to supersede international law and the Geneva Conventions, and to argue before the Supreme Court that those powers allow the government to imprison American citizens at will without right to trial indefinitely?
And finally, is it really, really conservative to relentlessly and dishonestly attack your opponent, to smear and distort his words and his positions at every turn, to ultimately demonize him and, by extension all of liberalism?
Is that what conservatism is all about now? Hating liberals?
Because, you know, I grew up in a pretty conservative environment. Rural, like the people John Kerry was talking to. And I don't recall those kinds of people having anything to do with this kind of "conservatism."
If I remember correctly (I'll have to double check -- the email I received from David last year is on a computer I haven't access to at the moment), the conservative environment he grew up in was right here in Idaho.
As U.S. Senate candidate Scott McClure says, he used to be a moderate Republican here in Idaho, but those who now call themselves "conservative Republicans" in this state are anything but. Those here in the Gem State who truly believe in "compassionate conservatism" should most assuredly not continue to vote-in the wingnut wierdos of the past. If they really do believe in the classic definition of "conservative," they should be voting for Democrats.
As I've said here before, to realize the full potential of our great state, we need to reach a balance, between fiscal conservatism and social liberalism. Right now, that balance has been tossed into a cocked hat by the wingers running Idaho. Moderate Republicans and moderate Democrats (who I believe are the vast majority in Idaho) can and should work together. We just need to get rid of the jerkweed right-wingers to make it happen.
UPDATE: Yep, I remembered correctly -- Dave Neiwert is a 4th generation Idahoan, from Idaho Falls. Nice to know such a talent hails from Southeast Idaho.
And the answer to the question we posted last week is --
Scott McClure, Idaho Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate. Mr. McClure was a former moderate Republican until he realized the right-wingers in this state had hijacked the GOP and no longer believed in anything that being a Republican used to stand for.
As Scott says on his website, "I realized that their policies ignore what used to be considered the cornerstones of the Republicanism that I grew up with as a child: 1) Fiscal responsibility, 2) Maintenance of a strong position of moral leadership in the world community, 3) Support of a strong military, and 4) Staunch defense of personal freedoms. On every point, the Democratic Party has taken the position of leadership. Therefore, changing title from Republican to Democrat allows me to defend those principles I held so dear throughout my life." Mr. McClure, we Democrats are proud and honored to have you working beside us.
Folks have been making guesses about this for a week. Some of the names bandied about were:
- Former Idaho Governor Phil Batt (who has apparently taken some heat from right-wingers lately. Come on over, Phil -- nothin' but love here, bud...).
- Butch Otter (In his younger day ol' Butch could have been a Dem, but he's pretty much lost to the dark side).
- Former Idaho state legislator Vern Ravenscroft (now there's a name from when dinosaurs walked the earth. Last I'd heard of him, it was when wicked witch of the West Helen Chenoweth admitted to knockin' boots with him for six years -- unbeknownst to Mrs. Ravenscroft.)
- Bruce Willis (I believe Bruno is a supporter of Commander Bunnypants Dubya -- I guess they both enjoy pretending to be military men).
To go to the Scott McClure for U.S. Senate website, click here.
Sniff-sniff -- ahhhhh, can you smell it? It's the tangy scent of Gem State GOoPer desperation wafting on the breeze...
From: China Veldhouse-Gum
To: (someone who sure as hell isn't a Republican)
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 4:08 PM
Subject: (Dem recipiant), the Idaho GOP needs your help
Dear (amused Democrat),
There are just 109 days left until election day, and the Idaho Republican Party needs your help! We are busy planning the re-election of targeted legislators and the election of key races across the state and we need to know if we can count on you.
The Democrats are out in full force, registering voters at a record rate. We need to register two Republicans for every Democrat they register. We are in desperate need of people who can help walk precincts to identify voters, make phone calls, help with voter registration events, and assist with data entry in the state headquarters.
(Democratic recipiant who is now laughing his/her ass off), because the state party knows how important volunteers are to winning a campaign, a training program has been created that will get you up to speed on exactly what you can do to get out the Republican message and get your friends, family, and neighbors to vote Republican.
The training is called 72-hour training -- referring to the huge get out the vote push in the last 72 hours before the election. Training sessions take place at the State Headquarters:
1111 S. Orchard #230
Tuesdays at 7pm
Saturdays at 10 am
The 72-Hour program training will go on until election day, but we need your help now!
It appears China Veldhouse-Gum (now there's a name that rolls off the tongue) is in need of volunteers. Since China's been kind enough to send out an invitation to one Democrat, I have to assume it goes out to us all.
I suggest all you Boise-area Democrats head over to the Repubs meeting this Tuesday evening and next Saturday and see what you can do to assist them in any way you can.
No thanks necessary, China -- always glad to help.
"For more than three decades, the Republican Party has relied on the "culture war" to rescue their chances every four years, from Richard Nixon's campaign against the liberal news media to George H. W. Bush's campaign against the liberal flag-burners. In this culture war, the real divide is between "regular people" and an endlessly scheming "liberal elite." This strategy allows them to depict themselves as friends of the common people even as they gut workplace safety rules and lay plans to turn Social Security over to Wall Street. Most important, it has allowed Republicans to speak the language of populism."
An opinion about how the surety of losing wins votes for the Republican party.
..."Records released so far do not put to rest questions over whether Bush fulfilled his National Guard service for a period during the Vietnam War, the AP argued in papers filed in federal court in New York. Those records came from federal records clearinghouses. Texas law requires separate record keeping for state National Guard service, and those records should exist on microfilm in Austin, the AP said. ..."
The lid is blowing off. - global coverage of alleged child abuse at Abu Ghraib grows, US Media hides under the bedSubmitted by ianstenseng on Fri, 07/16/2004 - 12:00pm.
Tom Tomorrow reports that the story of the 107 imprisoned, tortured, and raped children in Abu Ghraib is beginning to break all over the world, as the US media remains in patriotic silence. We're already about to lose our first ally over this, Norway.
News reports came out yesterday that the Idaho National Guard has issued a set of talking points for Guard soldiers to use when they speak to the media. These points tell them to focus on their confidence in U.S. troops and support for the war in Iraq. Ooookaaay...
In this month's newsletter to the 116th Brigade Combat Team, the unit's public affairs officer told soldiers that referring to the approved themes "adds continuity to the message we are portraying as a unit."
The five "command themes" are:
- pride in being on active duty
- support for the U.S. presence in Iraq
- confidence in American troops
- commitment to unified forces
- appreciation for families and employers
"Those are the messages we want out there right now," said Capt. Monte Hibbert, the officer who wrote the article. Hibbert, with his wife Farhana, own and operate Idaho Unido, a spanish language newspaper out of Pocatello, and are both Republicans.
Hibbert claims he didn't intend to restrict comments the soldiers could make to the media, and I hope that's the case. After all, a newspaper man should be well acquainted with the 1st Amendment.
I don't believe there's anything wrong, per se, with the themes. But when soldiers are given "guidelines" like these, most of them are going to assume that if they cross them, they're going to feel heat from the brass. It has the subtle but chilling effect of making soldiers think twice if they talk to the media. Bland, watered-down statements or even silence would obviously be preferred by those who lean far-right in the military and, of course, to the Bush administration.
Here's my question to Capt. Hibbert and his superiors: with troops as smart and well-trained as the men and women in our Idaho National Guard, shouldn't we assume they're intelligent enough to decide for themselves what they can say to the media? I'm more than willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.
How do we nurture the healing side of religion over the killing side? How do we protect the soul of democracy against bad theology in service of an imperial state?
I trace my spiritual lineage back to a radical Baptist in England named Thomas Helwys who believed that God, and not the King, was Lord of conscience. In 1612 Roman Catholics were the embattled target of the Crown and Thomas Helwys, the Baptist, came to their defense with the first tract in English demanding full religious liberty. Here's what he said: read more »
The news is slowly leaking out about the children being sodomized at Abu Ghraib. Sy Hersh, speaking at the ALCU convention, mentioned that not only did those working on behalf of the U.S. do it, they videotaped it. From the other bloggers' reports, it’s beyond appalling -- reading about the screams of the children, it just makes you sick to your stomach. Mothers and wives who were also detained sent out notes to their husbands to please kill them because of all the misery at the prison.
Naturally, the national news is very slow to report on these acts of violence due to their nature. American's wouldn't do anything this appalling! Currently it's up to the bloggers to spread the news of these atrocious acts.
We must keep the pressure on the major news sources to force them finally to admit how reprehensible this really is. I’m sure there is a lot of pressure from the government to keep this hush-hush. This would be another big black eye for the Bushes.
Since Rush Limbaugh believes these are college pranks, let’s have Rush take one for the team and see how he likes it. For more reports about this, the Daily Kos blog has some observant write-ups to fill in the vacant news reporting.
As we descend to an all time low, we must ask: who is in charge? My answer is, it goes all the way to the top. Bush and the Republican Party have one agenda on their mind -- to get what they want with no conscience to what happens to people who get in their way. This is what’s happening to the lower and middle classes currently, the big stick...
Just received this email from Democracy for America on their newest Dean Dozen, and it includes Idaho's own Nicole LeFavour:
Nicole LeFavour for Idaho State House. Idaho needs leaders like Nicole LeFavour -- people who will fight for smaller class sizes, better health care and the conservation of our natural resources. She has helped defeat an anti-gay ballot initiative, brought community groups together to fight pollution and discrimination, and taught school in Boise. Democracy for America proudly supports teacher, labor advocate and human rights campaigner Nicole LeFavour. www.nicolefordistrict19.com
A big ol' shout out and congratulation to Ms. LeFavour and her team -- she's going to win her race, and this endorsement is just icing on the cake!
Besides the support of Howard Dean's Democracy for America organization, I hope it means she'll get more money for her campaign. Way to go, Nicole!
AMENDMENT BEFORE THE SENATE: Do you hate homosexuals and think bigotry ought to be written into the Constitution?
Sen. Larry "what rumors?" Craig (R-ID):
- Votes YES
Sen. Mike "what rumors, Larry?" Crapo (R-ID):
- Votes YES
The GOoPmeisters in the U.S. Senate didn't even get enough votes to reach cloture (a parliamentary procedure by which debate is ended and an immediate vote is taken on the matter under discussion). They lost this round, and knew they would beforehand. But our dynamic duo of Craig and Crapo made sure they scrawled their mark in support of prejudice and inequality anyway. Ain't they just a piece of work?
It's clowns like these two who give Idaho such a bad reputation. Let's get to the polls in November and see if we can't break up these lovebirds.
Naomi Preston, Idaho Democratic candidate for U.S. House of Representatives
has her new website up. She's going up against Butch "I only voted for the Medicare
bill because my convictions are weaker than my party's threats" Otter. And folks,
we here in Idaho absolutely need Naomi in Congress.
Is Butch Otter a nice person? I suppose so. Is he the kind of guy you could
sit down a have a beer with? Probably. Is he the man to stand up for the needs
of everyday Idahoans, a person who can make the right choices about our state,
even if it goes against his party's wishes? Hell no.
He's proven that already.
Seven days a week, 24 hours a day, Fox News Channel turns Republican talking points into news headlines. Now Uncovered director Robert Greenwald -- working with a group of Fox-monitoring MoveOn members -- has put together a documentary film called Outfoxed that exposes Fox for what it is: partisan spin, not news.
This Sunday evening, July 18th, you're invited to be among the first to see Outfoxed at one of over 2,500 house parties across the nation, hosted by MoveOn and Common Cause members. Then join together in a coast-to-coast conference call with comedian and radio host Al Franken and the movie's director, Robert Greenwald. We'll kick off an exciting campaign to take on Fox for its partisan reporting and deceptive slogan "Fair and Balanced."
Throughout Idaho, folks are hosting houseparties to show Outfoxed. You can find viewings in Boise, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho Falls, Meridian and Pocatello, and I'm sure many more will be announced in the next couple days. Just click here to sign up to attend, or to host your own party. I'm all signed up and ready to watch the doc this Sunday.
Time to skin us a Fox!
Can you guess which Idahoan wrote this?
Throughout my life I have thought of myself as a moderate Republican. Over the last three years, however, I have become increasingly disenchanted with the policies of the current administration and Republican Congress. I realized that their policies ignore what used to be considered the cornerstones of the Republicanism that I grew up with as a child: 1) Fiscal responsibility, 2) Maintenance of a strong position of moral leadership in the world community, 3) Support of a strong military, and 4) Staunch defense of personal freedoms. On every point, the Democratic Party has taken the position of leadership. Therefore, changing title from Republican to Democrat allows me to defend those principles I held so dear throughout my life. I have made the change and have done so proudly.
The writer's website should be up in a few days. I'll tell you then.
UPDATE 07/19/04: Click here for the answer.
Writer, GOP shill and (after a fashion) gay activist Andrew Sullivan usually gets nothing from me but distain. But being gay, he's often torn between his slavering devotion for the right-wing fundies, and his repeated astonishment that they despise his kind.
Sully is the original kid who wakes up on Christmas morning only to find a truck has accidentally rolled backward into his house and dumped a huge pile of horse manure into the living room. Instead of being horrified at what happened, Sully dives into the steaming pile every time, thinking there's a pony hiding nearby. Charlie Brown had less trust of Lucy than Sully does of his Rethug masters.
In his latest article for The New Republic, Sullivan dissects the radio speech George W. Bush's gave Sunday, where Bush defends and promotes his approval of the Federal Marriage Amendment. Sully gives the kind of refutation that can only be put forth by someone with so much to lose if this amendment passes. It's definitely worth a read -- click here to see for yourself. I'm sorry to see Sully only be this articulate and enlightened when his way of life is threatened.
Yesterday I read an article that the French government was investigating Vice President Dick “blank off” Cheney for bribery, corruption and other Republican tactics. As C.E.O. of Halliburton, Dick did a real number on a deal for a reactor in Nigeria. In short detail, the whole thing is a big abhorrent back door deal.
The French government has been investigating all the crimes committed by various companies and guess who the worst was? The Magistrate assigned to overseeing the case is one of the best in dealing with political corruption. His credentials include taking down almost the entire French government in the 90's for scandal and corruption. The French are planning on calling Dick to testify in the upcoming trail. I wonder how many nasty words Dick can learn in French? read more »
What leftie, commie, pinko traitor said this?
"I think the fact of the matter, of course, (same-sex relationship recognition) is regulated by the states. I think different states are likely to come to different conclusions, and that's appropriate. I don't think there should necessarily be a federal policy in this area. I try to be open-minded about it as much as I can, and tolerant of those relationships. And like (Senator) Joe (Lieberman), I also wrestle with the extent to which there ought to be legal sanction of those relationships. I think we ought to do everything we can to tolerate and accommodate whatever kind of relationships people want to enter into."
Who said this? None other than Dick Cheney, during the 2000 vice-presidential debate. To read lots of other conservative GOoPers arguing against the Federal Marriage Amendment, click this link at the Human Rights Campaign website.
If only the wingers were capable of doing as they say, instead of doing as Karl Rove commands.
My house is built with wood, I use paper and Mota only knows what other wood-based products. I believe properly-managed forests are a renewable resource and an important industry necessary for good jobs and the U.S. economy. America needs to explore in a planned and careful way for energy, in addition to ramping up work on wind, solar, hydrogen and yes, even nuclear. There are people, lots of good folks, who love to ride dirt bikes and four-wheelers and snowmobiles. To everything, there should be a balance.
But after watching the Bush badministration for the last 3.5+ years, I'm as certain as the sun will rise in the morning that with this ruling -- like everything else they touch -- they'll choose every wrong decision possible and run with it like a stray dog with garbage. Holden, subbing for Atrios at Eschaton, has more: read more »
MoveOn.org is sponsoring a petition to be sent to President Bush and your senators and representatives asking them to vote against the Federal Marriage Amendment. This amendment is coming up for a vote this Wednesday in the Senate, and if passed through Congress, it would deny same-sex couples the right to marry.
Whether you're comfortable or not with same-sex marriage has not one damn thing to do with this amendment. There are lots of things that right-winger's spout and spew every day, things I disagree with to the very marrow of my bones, but I'm not about to demand that their 1st Amendment rights be repealed to shut those clowns the hell up.
When two adults truly love each other, whatever their sexual orientation, we should be shouting "Hell Yeah!" from the rooftops, not trying to force them underground and out of the light.
Here's the letter I sent today through the petition at MoveOn.org: read more »